Toxic Metals in E-Cigarette Vapor?

Toxic metals in e-cigarette vaporRecently there have been reports about a new study showing that e-cigarette vapor contains toxic metals.  Several news outlets have reported this, and they all appear to be basing their information entirely on one source: the official press release from the institution where the study was conducted, the University of Southern California (USC).

The study compared the chemical content of vapor from e-cigarettes to that of smoke from traditional cigarettes, according to USC.  Their study revealed that while very high amounts of cancer-causing hydrocarbons were detected in cigarette smoke, the levels of these substances were ‘reduced to almost zero’ in vapor.

‘However,’ said press release author Robert Perkins, ‘despite the lack of harmful organic material and a decrease in the majority of toxic metals emissions, e-cigarette smoke [sic] contains the toxic element chromium, absent from traditional cigarettes, as well as nickel at levels four times higher than normal cigarettes. In addition, several other toxic metals such as lead and zinc were also found in secondhand e-cigarette smoke [sic], though in concentrations lower than for normal cigarettes.’

This sounds bad… Should we be concerned?

One of the study’s authors, Dr. Constantinos Sioutas, says that while the presence of these metals does raise concerns, overall their study shows that e-cigarettes are safer than smoking.

The study’s lead author, Ph.D. student Arian Saffari, said, ‘The metal particles likely come from the cartridge of the e-cigarette devices themselves, which opens up the possibility that better manufacturing standards for the devices could reduce the quantity of metals in the smoke.’  Only one model of e-cigarette was tested, the Elips Serie C.

All of the experiments were conducted ‘in offices and rooms’ to better mimic real-world conditions.  Researchers collected air particles from the room while volunteers were smoking or vaping within.  It is unclear whether or not smoking and vaping were tested in the same rooms.

The abstract for the study states that ‘specific metals (e.g. Ni [nickel] and Ag [silver]) still displayed a higher emission rate from e-cigarettes,’ and, ‘with the exception of Ni, Zn [zinc], and Ag, the consumption of e-cigarettes resulted in a remarkable decrease in secondhand exposure to all metals and organic compounds.’

I find it very strange that silver is being noted in the abstract, twice, while chromium is completely left out.

Ok… So what does the study actually show?

I was not able to obtain the full text of this study.  However, the abstract includes a full data sheet attached.  Luckily for us, the data sheet tells us everything we need to know.

Testing Omitted

The data sheet includes all results from tests done on e-cigarette vapor, cigarette smoke, and outdoor air.  The fact that outdoor air was even tested was omitted from both the abstract and the press release.  This is curious considering that the findings from outdoor air make e-cigarettes look extremely safe by comparison.

Data Crunching

The metals cited as a concern in either the abstract or the press release are nickel, chromium, zinc, lead, and silver.  Below is a quick breakdown of the specific findings of each of these metals.

  • Chromium: Levels were 4 times higher in vapor than smoke, yet still less than in outdoor air.
  • Nickel: While nickel was found at slightly lower levels in vapor than in smoke, it was a little higher in vapor than in outdoor air.  (While it does state in the press release that nickel was ‘4 times higher than in cigarette smoke,’ the data do not support that statement.)
  • Zinc: Levels were slightly higher than in outdoor air, yet much lower than in smoke.
  • Silver: Vapor and smoke yielded almost identical levels, yet much less than in outdoor air.
  • Lead: Levels in vapor were lower than in outdoor air, and much less than in smoke.

Essentially, the researchers seemed to raise concern over slight differences that are so small they might just disappear if the experiment were repeated.  From what I can see, silver and lead are not a concern at all in vapor.

It is odd that nickel and zinc were detected at higher levels than outdoor air, yet again, the differences were very slight.

The only real anomaly is the issue of chromium.

Possible Reasons

So why are we seeing results like this?

The researchers state that the increased emissions of these metals may be due to the way the vaporizer is designed.  It is indeed possible that this is the case.  Atomizers are made of metal alloys after all, and could lead to some emissions.

However, as I said earlier, chromium is the only metal whose result is high enough to be notable in vapor.  If the increased levels were due to the metals present in the atomizer or other parts of the e-cigarette, we should see clearly elevated levels of other metals.  Yet, we do not.

We must, then, entertain other possible reasons for the increased chromium found in vapor.  Since there is still more chromium detected in outdoor air, it is possible that the e-cigarette was contaminated.  If this were the case, however, levels of other metals would also be very similar to that detected in outdoor air.

In the end, the best explanation for this is factory contamination.  Since they only tested one model of e-cigarette, they have nothing to compare it to (except perhaps another identical model), so it is quite possible that the excess chromium came from the facility that produced that particular e-cigarette.

So what does all of this mean?

For starters, it is blatantly irresponsible for the university to issue this press release claiming that both nickel and chromium were present at levels 4 times higher in vapor than in cigarette smoke, when in reality only chromium was found at such levels.  This, along with the convenient omission of data collected on outdoor air, has lead to a whole host of misinformation being perpetuated in the media.

When the data are examined independently, they show very little reason to be concerned about e-cigarette vapor emissions.  In fact, this study shows very clearly that vaping is a much safer alternative to smoking cigarettes.

Furthermore, it must be noted that the levels of all metals detected in vapor over which the researchers expressed concern are over a thousand times less than the OSHA permissible exposure limits for these metals.  In other words, the levels they found are considered extremely safe.

In this article, James Dunworth interviews Dr. Riccardo Pilosa, a world-renowned expert in tobacco addiction. A graph is included (see below) which compares the risks of a number of nicotine products.  When tobacco cigarettes are ranked at 100, e-cigarettes are ranked at only 4.

E-cigarette vs nicotine products harm


In the end, this study should leave you with nothing to worry about at all.

13 thoughts on “Toxic Metals in E-Cigarette Vapor?”

  1. great article..interesting to say the last thans for posting it and your site ! love it and the giveaways! :) much appreciation here!

  2. Another well done article. I find myself coming to this site more and more as the content gets better and better

  3. Chromium and nickel are coming for the wire coil.. nothing else, no where.
    well. possibly the tank i guess but that would be so microscopic i doubt it could be measured properly.

    why oh why do these studies ALWAYS test crappy chinese hardware and crappy chinese juices. – i mean for the love of god, test some real hardware and organic juices.

    1. Christina Grace

      Smart thinking :) I thought a lot about whether to suggest that in my article, but I couldn’t verify that we’re actually heating up the wire enough to shed that much in the vapor – in fact I couldn’t even verify whether the e-cig they tested had nichrome wire in the atomizer…

      And I’ve come to wonder if some of these researchers go out of their way to find the lowest quality products to test ;)

      1. Robert Blair

        My thoughts exactly. After reading the results of some of these “Studies” and the resulting press, one truly IS left wondering what products were tested, how were they used/abused to produce the data, and how the data were manipulated to get the final (desired) results. Are the companies providing products for testing putting “Ringers” in the game? (Big tobacco companies using inferior products to skew the results?)
        What DOESN’T get reported is that while some chemicals may indeed be present, Vapor STILL usually contains them in quantities FAR lower than cigarette smoke.
        Will they ever be COMPLETELY “Safe”? Probably not, but (in the public health sense) as a tool for “Harm Reduction”…

  4. josh martin

    thanks for sharing the info. great article! have had some questions that needed answered and found them all here. love this site!

  5. I build my own coils and always torch them on my mod before I wick. I first time I did this, I had my nose right above the kanthal coil and for the first 2 or 3 seconds after you hit the fire button there is a nasty horrid smell, I believe it is the outer coating of the wire. After that there is no smell what so ever. Always torch your coils before wicking!

  6. It seems like a massive oversight to have not included a control indoor group of households without vaping or smoking occurring. Perhaps it was convenient to structure the “research” this way….

    I can’t take the nickel or chromium data seriously without such a control group, especially in lieu of the relative outdoor air measurements taken.

  7. Love your articles Christina. Very informative and well written! Say….are these the same scientists who brought us global warming?

  8. Moneytha Burns

    We need a new article written based on the new evidence from Johns Hopkins please! They’re quoting arsenic now as being found. The study was done a couple of days so Feb. 22, 2018.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top